“Fiery speeches and scenes of wildest
excitement marked a mass meeting of the unemployed held in Association hall
yesterday afternoon In many ways the meeting was a remarkable one and unique in
the annals of the city, calling attention, as it did, to a condition which few
had believed to be so serious.”
Hamilton
Spectator. January 13, 19141
For
many Hamiltonians the first few months of the year were times of unemployment.
Outdoor work was less available in the deepest times of winter, while many
factories laid many of its workers off.
However,
the early weeks of 1914 were a time when the number of unemployed men was
exceptionally high.
A
mass meeting was called for 3 p.m. on Monday January 13, 1914 to discuss the
situation. Long before the stated time to begin the meeting, fully 1,000
jobless men and women jammed their way into Association, to the point that not
a vacant seat was left on the floor or in the balcony. Many had to stand
throughout the meeting, while others were unable to get into the hall.
Invited
to sit on the platform were pastors of a number of Hamilton churches, Allan
Studholme, member of the Ontario legislature, Mayor John Allan and City
Controller T. S. Morris.
Rev.
W.E. Gilroy, of the First Congregational church, was selected as chair of the
meeting
Pastor
Gilroy declared the meeting open and began by saying :
“The
deepest and most crucial problem of today is that of the unemployed, and it
appears to me that the only cure is that of prevention. However, we are not
here to discuss theories, but to urge upon the city authorities that they do
something to relieve the situation.
“I
do not know what is possible for the civic authorities to do, but it is my
sincere hope that some action will be taken. It is not a problem that affects
only the unemployed, but affects us all. I sympathize with the newspapers and
the civic authorities in trying to minimize the cry of ‘blue ruin,’ but at the
same time there is danger in closing our eyes and refusing to face facts.”1
“Pathetic
Plea From Army of Unemployed : Mass Meeting Asked Council to Take Action :
Mayor and Minsters Addressed the Gathering.”
Hamilton
Spectator January 13, 1914.
Reverend
Gilroy then introduced Controller Morris, who at that time, was the only member
of City Council present. Controller requested that he be permitted to postpone
his remarks until some of his council colleagues arrived. Morris was urged to
speak anyway, and at that moment, Mayor Allan was spotted standing at the back
of the hall.
The
mayor was requested to come to the platform and after he was seated, the
controller proceeded :
“
‘Now I am happy,’ Controller Morris said. To prove it, he then read a newspaper
clipping which put Mayor Allan in the worst possible light before the meeting.
This was a newspaper interview, in which the mayor had criticized Controller
Morris for several suggestions the latter had made.
“Controller
Morris declared that he thought it was the duty of the city to spread municipal
work over the greater part of the year, instead of only a part thereof. ‘I am
informed,’ he said ‘that in ordinary course of events, city work will not be
started again until about April 1. Now, there is some work which can be done
just as well in December as in June.
“
‘You have heard the mayor’s plan. If you were satisfied with that, I will give
way to the mayor.’ (Cries of ‘No! No!) ‘ As I understand it, men, what you want
is a chance to work. Now, if I understand the mayor’s remarks, as reported in
the newspapers – I don’t want to be unfair – there is no work to do that would
not be unprofitable to the city.
“
‘ In other words, the mayor’s plans would pauperize a great many
self-respecting citizens of Hamilton. I am opposed to dolling out charity to
self-respecting citizens. I said some weeks ago that I was in favour of going
ahead with a great municipal work at once. I refer now to the system of local
flood sewers.
“
‘Controller Cooper, who is a practical man, has said that this work could be
done during the winter months. I used all the energy I was possessed of to get
that matter before the people without result. Had I done so, there would have
been work for all the unemployed. The question is now, how shall we provide
work? That is the clear-cut issue, and I have taken the trouble to see the city
engineer in regard to just this matter.
“
‘In the first place, there is Charlton avenue. The other day I drove along
there with a city foreman – a practical man – who pointed out to me what a narrow
roadway it was and how it could be made better. That work could be done now
better than in the summertime. Charlton avenue east is also growing in
importance, and is destined to be a feeder to the incline in the east end.
“
‘Then there is the coal oil inlet that sweet-smelling spot. That can be filled
in now better than in the summertime. As to the Beckett drive, I was told that
there was no use of the city buying the property because it would always be a
park, that having been provided years ago in an agreement.
“
‘But recently, when an influential deputation of ladies swept down on Mayor
Allan and asked him to secure this property, he turned and said, ‘Why,
certainly, ladies, I can fix that up for you.’ There was no more surprised man
in the city of Hamilton when he said that than myself. At the same time, I was
glad to hear him say, and I am delighted that, even at the eleventh hour, he favors
the undertaking, and I will do all that I can to co-operate with him.’ ” 1
On
concluding his remarks, Controller took his seat on the platform. Pastor
Gilroy, in his role as chairman of the meeting, then made his opinion known
regarding the manner in which Controller Morris had addressed the question
facing those assembled, particularly the critical comments directed towards the
mayor :
“
‘ I have allowed Controller Morris a good deal of latitude,’ he said, ‘ because
he was known to be favorable to the aims of this meeting. It would be rather
unfortunate, however, if our meeting developed into an old-fashioned
electioneering meeting between Controller Morris and Mayor Allan.’ ”1
The
next speaker was then introduced, Dean Abbott, of Christ’s Church cathedral.
The
Anglican minister, who was instrumental in setting up the mass meeting, said
that he felt it was his duty to do something to help those suffering because of
the unemployment:
“
‘It is the function of the church to puncture social abscesses,’ he said. “I’m
under the impression that I am largely responsible for this meeting, and it
seems to me that first of all what the general public to realize that, while
optimism is all right in its way, there are at least 2,000 unemployed men in
this city.
“
‘There is a crying need for employment. In my own parish, I have 1,000
families, among whom there are some out of work, and I am literally besieged
with applications daily. A great many of these men have refused to take one
cent from me, and desire nothing so much as work. In the north end of the city
the other day, I found a family, consisting of father, mother and five children
living in an atmosphere below freezing point. Four of the poor little kiddies
had their feet in the oven to keep warm.
“
‘It is upon women and children that these things come hardest, and I feel sure
that this meeting will accomplish a great deal of good. You may be sure of one
thing, men, and that is when the heart of the community is touched, you will
find it a very tender-hearted community indeed.
“
‘ I firmly believe that the time has come in this city for an associated
charity. That is to say, where all our churches and citizens shall be able to
pool in order that money may reach those who most deserve it. At the present
time, there is too much overlapping in this direction.’”1
Following
Dean Abbott’s remarks, the president of the East Hamilton Progressive
association stood to introduce a resolution to be presented to Hamilton City
Council.
The
resolution read as follows :
“That
this meeting of the unemployed and of the citizens and ratepayers of Hamilton
desire to impress upon the council, the aldermen and the board of control, the
imperative need of immediately putting hand such work of public utility as
shall relieve the distressing condition now prevailing through lack of
employment.”
Samuel
Landers, editor of the Labor News, seconded the resolution. After it was passed
enthusiastically, Landers suggested that Mayor Allan forward the resolution to
City Council at the earliest possible opportunity, a suggestion that the mayor
readily agreed to follow.
During
the meeting to this point, Mayor Allan had been silent, if noticeably
uncomfortable, as various negative comments were made about him.
As
the Spectator reporter in attendance noted:
“All
during the meeting, the mayor was prayed at and talked at and singled out for
attack. Through it all, however, he remained silent until it came his turn to
speak, although it was obvious at times that he strongly desired to return
answers to some of the statements made.”1
MLA
Allan Studholme in his speech to the meeting warmly praised a recent
announcement made the automobile manufacturer, Henry Ford, that he would pay a
minimum wage of $5 even to the man who swept the floors of his factory:
“
‘It is true,’ he said, ‘that it costs just as much to keep a floor-sweeper’s
family as it costs to keep a mechanic’s family. When the mayor says he cannot
find you work, he doesn’t understand t
hese
things at all, and I will tell him so to his face. These men, most of them, were
brought here by misrepresentation, and work has to be found for them somehow.
It is not as if the mayor had to put his hand down in his own pocket.
“If
the city council does not comply with our resolution, we will simply ask them
to step down.”1
Finally,
Mayor Allan was called upon to speak:
“
‘I don’t think any man in the house knows better what your condition is,’ he
said, ‘and I didn’t need this resolution to remind me of it. When I first came
into the hall today, it was my intention to remain in the back and listen to
the remarks of the different speakers. Perhaps I would have appreciated them
better from the back of the hall. I have a great deal of patience, but I found
it hard not to run up here once or twice while I was standing back there and
replying to some of the speeches.
“
‘I am used to hard knocks, however, and am able to stand them. Now, I do not
intend to mislead you, and I will tell you some things you probably will not
like. First of all, I cannot say to you that the city of Hamilton will give employment
to all, because it can’t do it. On the other hand, if we can find employment
for only a few, there is bound to be dissension.
“
‘Controller Morris has referred to Charlton avenue. Well, a man could work
there all day, with a pick, and he would get three shovels full at this time of
year. Regarding the coal oil inlet, when we wanted the earth to fill along the
base, like this year, we could not get it, and we had to buy slag to dump
there. If the city employs a large number of men, it wants to see that the men
get the money and that it is not spent for materials..
“
‘ It is all very well to talk about city work and passing resolutions of
sympathy and all that, but I tell you that it is impossible for the city of
Hamilton to furnish work for all the unemployed. All these fine speeches and
resolutions will not help one bit. We’ve got be practical. We have not been
idle, I promise you. The Lord knows we want to relieve the situation. It is no
pleasure to stand here and look at this audience, all or nearly all of whom are
unemployed.’ ”1
The
mayor’s remarks were not well received generally but the last statement really
drove a hostile reaction.
One
of the ministers present, Dr. Nelson, suggested that those who were out of
employment stand up. Only a half dozen of the nearly 1,000 present remained
seated.
In
its lead editorial regarding the meeting, the editor of the Hamilton flatly
declared that “it is natural that those in need of employment should look to
the civic government to provide it. And it should be provided.”2
2
“Work – Not Charity”
Hamilton Herald. January 13, 1914.
The
Herald took particular exception to the mayor’s reluctance to move of some of
the public works immediately : “Mayor Allan appears to assume that he has the
power and the right to say what shall and what shall not be done in this
matter.”2
The
Herald suggested that, as Mayor Allan had been a resident of New York City for
twenty-five years, perhaps he felt that in Hamilton the same conditions applied
as in American cities where the mayor was “a civic ruler, with power of veto
over the actions of the municipal council.”2
The
Herald concluded its editorial by pointing out that Mayor allan did not have “semi-autocratic”
power :
“He
is little more than chairman of the council and board of control, and has no
right to obstruct the actions, or override the will of his colleagues in the
civic government. Whatever measure the city council may see fit to relieve
present distress, Mayor Allan must acquiesce in. He may lead : he cannot
decide.”2
The
mass meeting’s resolution, duly passed, was then, as promised by Mayor Allan,
to take presented to the meeting of city council scheduled for later in the
day.
(To
be continued – when written!)