Monday, 15 April 2019

Board of Health Over-Officiousness - December 9, 1918


By December 9, 1918, there was little support left for the Hamilton Board of Health’s bans. Public gatherings were banned, store hours shortened, schools closed, and theater doors locked, all in the fight against the spread of influenza. There was also a ban on meetings.

The number of new cases of influenza reported per day was dropping as were the death rates. Public sentiment had decidedly turned against the board of health’s ban.

The Hamilton Herald generally fanned the flames of that opposition. When an incident involving an officious board of health, the Herald reported it in great detail, and in the same article got a little sarcastic in tone:


“Here is a true story illustrating the manner in which the health’s board’s ban is being enforced.

“The Rev. E.H. Bowden Taylor, curate of Christ’s church cathedral, has been conducting at his apartment, in a lodging house on Bold street, weekly classes for the benefit of Sunday School teachers. Of late, the subject of study is church history.

“On Friday evening, the class met as usual. There were only three present besides Mr. Taylor. Somebody in the house had evidently been giving hostile consideration to the classes, regarding them as held in defiance of the board of health’s order forbidding meetings of any sort; and this person called up the board of health by ‘phone and gave notification of the meeting then in progress in Rev. Mr. Taylor’s apartment.

“The class had almost completed its session when the door opened and an inquisitive face appeared on the threshold.

“ ‘What sort of meeting is this?’ enquired the owner of the face. ‘Is it a social gathering of some sort?’

“ ‘Well, something of that sort,’ replied Mr. Taylor. ‘We are engaged in the study of church history. Why do you ask?’

“ ‘ Because I am an officer of the board of health,’ said the uninvited visitor. ‘I see that your meeting is in contradiction of the board’s order. It must disperse.’

“ There was some further  conversation. While it was in progress, there came from an adjoining apartment, loud sounds of merriment mingled with blatant strains of a pianola.

“ ‘What is going on in there?’ enquired the officer.

“He was told that there was probably a social gathering, but that he had better go and find out himself. He did so. Opening the door, he found a party of seven persons in the apartment, having a good time. Asking the nature of the proceedings, he was informed that it was a social gathering.

“ ‘In that case,’ said he, ‘I have no authority to interfere so he took his departure.

“But he had not finished his duty. He was bound to see that his order for the dispersion of Mr. Taylor’s class of three was obeyed. Mrs. Taylor, glancing out of the window, saw him waiting in front of the house watching the door, and called the attention of her husband to the solitary figure keeping vigil there. So, in a spirit of mischief, it was decided that the three students should give the sentinel the slip, and they took their departure by a rear exit.

“ The weary minutes dragged on, and still the lonely sentinel kept watch outside. Finally, concluding the majesty of the health board was being defied, he hailed a assing policeman, and the two of them ascended to Mr. Taylor’s apartment and demanded admittance. Of course, they were promptly admitted.

“ ‘You are defying my order,’ said the officer sternly. ‘I must insist on the immediate dispersal of your class.’

“ ‘Why, my good man,’ replied Mr. Taylor mildly, ‘they went away long ago. If you doubt my word, you may search my premises.’

“Whereupon the health officer and his grinning companion withdrew, the former looking very crestfallen.

“From this incident it would appear that the officers vested with the authority to enforce the board of health’s restrictive order have been instructed to discriminate in favor of some gatherings and against others. Three students meeting in his private apartment for the purpose of studying church history constituted a dangerous assemblage in defiance of the order of the board, but a party of twice the size meeting in an apartment of the same size for the purpose of having a jolly social time, was an innocent gathering with which it was not the business of the health officer to interfere.

“Is it the theory where two or three Sunday School are gathered together, thither the ‘flu germ is strongly attracted, while ‘social gatherings’ have no attractions for him? Or is it held that the study church history predisposes the human system to influenza, but that laughter and song to the accompaniment of a pianola act as a sort of prophylactic?

“Whatever the explanation of the mystery, the experience of Mr. Taylor and his little class of students in church history serves to illuminate the fact that, whatever claim may be made with regard to an Englishman’s home being his castle, it is not true that a Canadian’s home is his castle when health officers are prowling around.”1

1 “Canadian’s Home is Not His Castle When Ban is On : Experience of Rev. E.H. Bowden Taylor With Majesty of Health Board Clearly Proves This : ‘Gathering’ Dispersed : Three Students Not Allowed to Study, But Party of Seven Permitted to Stay in Same House”

Hamilton Herald.    December 09, 1918.




No comments:

Post a Comment