Sunday, 20 October 2019

Demanding Deportation of Enemy Aliens - Feb. 1919


 “The date for the big mass meeting, under the auspices of the Great War Veterans’ association, to discuss with the public the advisability of having all alien enemies ousted from Canada, has been changed to Sunday, Feb. 9, and, instead of meetings in three theaters as first planned, it has been decided to hold only one in the Lyric theater. The doors will open at 2:30 o’clock and the meeting will commence at three o’clock sharp.”

Hamilton Spectator.   January 30, 1919.

Hamilton, like other cities in Canada, was in a state of upheaval in early 1919. The declaration of an armistice being signed on November 11, 1918, had effectively stopped all open conflict in the Great War, although an official peace treaty had not been signed by the end of January 1919.

The Hamilton factories which had been producing huge amounts of munitions for the war effort, suddenly found its contracts with the government cut. Munition workers soon were put out of work as the factories had to regroup for the peacetime economy. Added to the volatile ranks of the unemployed were large numbers of soldiers returning from western Europe, each looking for work.

Finally, there were a number of “alien enemies’ in the city, men from countries which had be the opponents in the Great War, notably those from Germany, and the former country of Austro-Hungarian. These men had been employed in the munitions factories for the most part and were viewed with great suspicion and hostility by those seeking work. It was estimated that about 5,000 men were unemployed in Hamilton in January 1919, and if nothing else, it was fervently hoped that the ‘enemy aliens’ would be deported so that they would no longer compete locally with others seeking work.

To push the federal government to do something about the alien labor problem, a mass meeting was organized to be held on Sunday, February 9, 1919:

“On the stage will be about 100 prominent citizens, representing the Dominion and provincial parliaments, city council, Canadian club, board of trade, trades and labor council, Independent Labor party, Kiwanis club, Rotary club, medical health department, police commissioners, Daughters of the Empire, Women’s Canadian club, Manufacturers’ association, and soldiers’ aid commission. Mayor Booker will be present also and open the meeting. It is being arranged for several of the most prominent men to speak, and their names will be announced later.

“The subject for discussion will be Alien Enemies and Their Deportation from Canada, which will embody the labor question and employment for returned soldiers.

“It is likely that the returned men will parade to the theater, accompanied by the veterans’ band, which will furnish music during the afternoon and occupy a section which will be reserved for them. The boxes of the theater will be reserved also.

“The G.W.V.A. wishes to thank J.A. Wall, genial manager of the Lyric, for granting them the use of the theater. “Mr. Wall is always to the front when there is anything to be done for the returned man,’ stated Secretary Cooke this morning, ‘and we wish him to know that all he has done is greatly appreciated.’1

1 “Veterans Want Aliens Ousted : Big Mass Meeting at the Lyric, Sunday, Feb. 9 : Soldiers Will Parade in a Body to Theater”

Hamilton Spectator.   January 30, 1919.

                Just one day before the mass meeting was to be held, it seemed that not all the major Hamilton organizations shared exactly the same view on the deportations being urged”

 “The trades and labor council held its regular monthly meeting last night. Many communications were received and dealt with, and as a result the election of officers which was to have been held last night, was deferred until the next meeting. A resolution from the G.W.V.A., dealing with the alien enemies was received, and a request that the trades and labor council endorse same. After a lengthy discussion the following resolution was unanimously carried :

‘While the trades and labor council is in sympathy with the G.W.V.A. in its desire to rid the country of all alien enemies, we feel the resolution as passed by it is too drastic., and while this council cannot see its way clear to endorse the resolution of the G.W.V.A. in its entirety , we do go on record as favoring the deportation of alien enemies who were interned and, by word or deed, have proven themselves to be disloyal to the country, and who are otherwise known to be dangerous, but that the other alien enemies be allowed to leave the country at their own pleasure. We also favor the deportation of all aliens who have been convicted of criminal offense.”2

2 “Would Deport Alien Enemies : But Only Lawbreakers Or Those Disloyal : That Is Attitude of Trades and Labor Council ”

Hamilton Spectator.   February 08, 1919.

Hearing rumors of the possibility of efforts to weaken the resolve to deport aliens forthwith, the leadership of the Great War Veterans’ association, which was the lead in organizing the mass meeting, would not entertain any watering down of the resolution which was to be put forward during the mass meeting:

 “The Great War Veterans’ association this morning received a report that officials of some of the larger organizations to be represented at the public mass meeting, to be held in the Lyric theater tomorrow afternoon, had taken objection to the resolution which the vets would submit concerning the aliens and their proposed deportation, and hurriedly called a meeting to discuss the matter, the meeting being held in one of the uptown offices. It was claimed that the resolution was too drastic and that a committee of citizens should be appointed to make an investigation of present conditions before the resolution was passed as being the feeling of the people of Hamilton.

“Speaking in reference to the matter this morning, President A.H. Peart, of the east end G.W.V.A., announced that it was too late now to make any alterations in the resolution. It had been drafted very carefully by officials of both branches of the Great War Veterans’ association and, in order to make any changes it would be necessary to call the men together again. This, he said, would not be done.

“ ‘The time has passed for further dilly-dallying on the alien question,’ he said, ‘and the returned soldiers in Hamilton are going to stand behind the resolution. Too much time had been lost already and we are going right through with our undertaking. The resolution will stand as it is at present and it will be moved tomorrow afternoon without any changes being made, eithers.

“Doors of the theater will be thrown open to the public at 2:30 o’clock tomorrow afternoon and the meeting will commence promptly at 3 o’clock.

“Among the speakers will be H.G. Fester, representing the trades and labor council; Controller Halcrow, Independent Labor party, and either George A. Martin or A.C. Garden, for the board of trade. The Canadian club, Rotary club, police commissioners, board of health, Manufacturers’ association and other bodies will be represented also.

“The resolution will be moved by Fred. Tresham and seconded by S.M. Jordan.”3

3 “War Veterans Will Stand By the Resolution : Refuse to Back Down On the Alien Question : Express Determination to See It Through : Say There Has Been Too Much Dilly-Dallying ”

Hamilton Spectator.   February 08, 1919.

Sunday February 9 arrived and the turnout for the mass meeting was overwhelming

The Spectator published the following detailed account of the meeting for its issue appearing on Monday, February 10, 1919:

 “With the unanimous endorsation and the thunderous acclamation of a mighty gathering of well-nigh 10,000 citizens, representative of every class of the community, stern resolutions, demanding the immediate deportation of enemy aliens and other undesirable foreigners, were sent on to the Dominion government from the great War Veterans’ meeting and outside the Lyric theater on Sunday afternoon.

“Following are the resolutions, sponsored by the Great War Veterans’ association and endorsed by the Hamilton board of trade, the Canadian club and the Hamilton trades and labor council:

          ‘Moved by F.W. Tresham, past president of the Great War Veterans of Hamilton, seconded by Sergt.-Major W. Jordan, D.C.M.:

‘That whereas there in the city of Hamilton, Ontario, and throughout Canada, a great number of people of German, Austrian, Turkish and Bulgarian origin, whom it is impossible to assimilate as Canadian citizens;

‘And whereas during the war, the majority of these alien enemies enjoyed their liberty and the protection of Canada without in any way contributing to the burden of the war;

‘And whereas at the present time, many of these alien enemies and other undesirables are employed in various industries throughout the country to the exclusion of our own true and loyal Canadian citizens;

‘And whereas it is the desire of the assembled citizens, in unison with the government, to promote future peace and harmony by constitutional methods;

‘Now, therefore, be it resolved, that we urge upon the government the necessity of removing the menace constituted by the presence of these enemy aliens and other undesirables in Canada by their immediate deportation to the countries from which they came;

‘And be it further resolved that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the acting prime minister of Canada and such other persons and bodies as may be designated by the chairman and secretary of this meeting;

‘And be it further resolved that a committee of five be appointed by this meeting to convey this resolution to the proper authorities’



‘Moved by A.C. Garden, seconded by A.H. Peart

‘That the government of the Dominion of Canada be requested to appoint a deportation committee, composed of citizens of Hamilton, with full power, to have deported from this city all undesirable and unpatriotic aliens to their respective countries of birth or naturalization.



‘Moved by Lieut.-Col. C.R. McCullough, seconded by Lieut. Charles W. Heming:

‘Resolved, that in order to co-operate with returned soldiers seeking employment and with employers of labor, and with the object of facilitating employment of such returned soldiers, a co-operative committee, composed of one representative of the west end branch of the G.W.V.A., one from the east end branch of the G.W.V.A., one from the Hamilton board of trade, one from the Canadian club of Hamilton and one from the ranks of labor, be appointed by this meeting of the citizens of the city of Hamilton, to enter forthwith upon the labors devolving upon such committee.’

                             THREE GREAT AUDIENCES

“Yesterday’s demonstration was one of the greatest in Hamilton’s history and bespoke the tremendous interest of the community concerning the alien question and its determination to have it settled, and that right soon. The L:yric theater was totally inadequate to contain the endless tide of men and women that poured from all parts of the city. About 2,500 were in the house when the doors were locked before 3 o’clock, with nearly three times that number waiting outside. Overflow meetings were hastily arranged. Sergt.-Major Jordan, R.G. Fester and G.C. Martin addressed a great crowd on Mary street outside the theater, while Controller Halcrow harangued another huge throng from the steps of the city hall. The resolutions were given a noisy endorsation, with hats thrown in the air.

“It was a critical and at time testy audience that was packed in the Lyric theater. There was but one business on hand, and that toinform the government of the feeling of the community on the alien question. No wavering half-measures, or modifications were tolerated, and F.F. MacPherson, representing the executive of the Canadian club who pleaded that discretion be exercised in deporting the aliens, was greeted with such a storm of hissing that he ceased to speak.

                             STRONG LANGUAGE

“Strong terminology was brought into use by the speakers. Sergt.-Major Jordan called the aliens ‘miserable vermin.’ They were of ‘a miserable, skunk-like type,’ according to his worship, Mayor Brooker. George C. Martin, speaking of conscientious objectors, called them ‘infernal skunks.’

“A.H. Peart, president of the G.W.V.A., gave warning that if the government did not meet the demand of the veterans he would not care to take responsibility for what might happen.

                             REPRESENTATIVE AUDIENCE

          “It could be truly said that the gathering was truly representative of every class of the community, although returned soldiers and working men seemed to predominate. An amusing feature was the presence of quite a sprinkling of foreigners, who endorsed by standing vote the resolution calling for their immediate deportation.

“The Great War Veterans’ band was on the stage and gave excellent music during the afternoon.

                             MAYOR C.G. BOOKER

“Mayor Booker, who presided, said in his opening remarks that there were two kinds of aliens – the friendly aliens, who had stood side by side with the allied cause, and were deserving of every kindness, and the representatives of ‘the bestial, skunk-like type’ who fattened on the sacrifices of the Canadian soldiers who were fighting the men of their own nation. ‘Get rid of them,’ said his worship.

“ ‘This is no time for supiness; we want strong men at the head of our affairs, so that these men who have been living upon the sacrifices  of our own boys should be sent out of the country for all time to come and that none of their breed be allowed to enter this country for the next fifty years,’ the mayor went on. He concluded with an extempore paraphrase of Psalm cxx1.

                             F.W. TESHAM

“The main resolution was introduced by F.W. Tresham, past president of the Great War Veterans’ association.

“ ‘We are actuated by a desire to serve the best interests of the community,’ said Mr. Tresham. ‘There are in the city of Hamilton, and throughout the Dominion, a great number of persons of alien enemy extraction who are permitted to enjoy the protection of Canada, and yet have been enabled to escape the burden of the war. Not only have they been immune from the responsibilities of citizenship, but they have been afforded exceptional opportunities of profiting by the war while the loyal sons of Canada shed their blood for freedom in Flanders and France. It is true that a few of these were interned, but the great majority of them were not interfered with, and the consequence is that the average alien enemy has become imbued with a wrong idea of their status in this country. They have become drunk with prosperity and emboldened by what they conceive to be the weakness of the government. Strong steps must be taken to save our country from future strife and internal disruption.

“ ‘Germany is still dangerous politically. The Germans are past masters at the art of propaganda. They are past masters at the art of propaganda. They are seeking to bring about a state of chaos in the allied countries similar to that they established in Russia. I hear people saying that the Germans are all right because they are treating the Canadian boys so well in Germany. It is a dangerous doctrine to preach. Do not let ourselves become tools in the hand of the enemy. The German people have proved themselves unworthy, and we must never permit any influence to be brought to bear that would place the Germans on the same footing as our own Canadian boys.

“There are in our midst undesirable aliens other than enemy aliens who are really a menace to the welfare of the community and they ought to be deported right away. It may be news to some of you to know that there are right in this city out-and-out anarchists and not a few Bolsheviks. Bolshevism is the child of German intrigue. We don’t want it in this country. (Loud applause.)  We have their names and addresses and stand prepared to support the authorities in taking action to protect society against them. It is time that all true and loyal citizens should get together in the spirit of co-operation and give and take to adjust differences between themselves at this time. The big people must come down to the viewpoint of the other chap, and the other must take into consideration the view of the big people. (Applause.) The man who seeks to create war between capital and labor, I don’t care who he is – laborer, soldier or manufacturer – is an enemy to this country. Give the returned man his due. All he asks for is a square deal and a chance to get along on the word. (Applause.) I think that the idea that every returned soldier is a crank, every workingman a chronic kicker, and every manufacturer a crook, is simply ridiculous. The extremists are pretty well distributed.

“ ‘If the government doesn’t meet our demands, then we will fire a volley of ballots that will be more effective than bullets, at the earliest days,’ assured Mr. Tresham. ‘If they do not do what the people call upon them to mdo, then out they go! (Loud applause.)

“ ‘So long as the alien enemies remain in this country, they will be a constant source of irritation and trouble. The government must give them a one-way excursion ticket,’ Mr. Tresham said in conclusion.

“His last remark was greeted with cries of ‘Make them pay their own way.’

                   SERGT.-MAJ. WILLIAM JORDAN, D.C.M.

“William Jordan, D.C.M., late regimental sergeant-major of the P.P.C.L.I., seconded the resolution.

“ ‘The Germans plotted against civilization for forty years,’ he said, ‘and the devastation that they have wrought in France and Belgium has made the name of Germany stink in the nostrils of civilization. We don’t want to be unfair, we don’t want to adopt any unconstitutional methods. People ask us why don’t we do the same as they did in Winnipeg? I am the last person in the world to sanction any such methods and wold stand aloof from it, for it is not playing the game. We have learned to play the game in France and Belgium. There is a great deal of unrest at the present time, and I hold that the government is absolutely to blame. (Applause.) They have shown that they are not strong enough to deal with this question. Many a time have these questions been brought before them, and the deputations have waited upon them at Ottawa, but they have always sidestepped. But we are determined that on this question the government shall not sidestep . They have got to come across; they have got to do something. We demand that these aliens be immediately deported to the countries from which they came.

“ ‘There are in this city, 4,000 alien enemies, and nearly all of them holding jobs. (Cries of ‘Kick them out!) There are in this city 5,000 true and loyal Canadian citizens walking the streets without employment. (Cries of ‘Shame!)

“ ‘Let us see that these miserable vermin that have been allowed to run at large and flout the laws of this country be exterminated as far as Canada is concerned,’ said the sergeant-major in conclusion.

                             H.G. FESTER

“Labor’s viewpoint was ably set forth by H.G. Fester, of the trades and labor council.

“ ‘While we have possibly disagreed a little of the phrasing of the resolution, we are solidly behind its principles.,’ Mr. Fester announced, amidst applause. ‘You will readily understand that in our organization comprising so many different classes and kinds of people, it is only natural that there should be some extremists at both ends of the line, and we have had some very bitter battles over this question during the past month or so. However, the great bulk of opinion has been solidly in favor of this resolution. There are thousands of enemy aliens in this country who have spoken disloyally during the war, and these should be weeded out and sent back. Again, we hear a lot about the so-called friendly aliens. WE find that they are giving the police just as much trouble as the enemy aliens.

“The labor movement has no apologies to make regarding the aliens, friendly or enemy. Time after time we have adjured the government to be careful as to the class of men whom they were permitting to enter the country. But the government paid no heed. They were the representatives of certain interests and classes who desired to obtain cheap labor, and lots of it! (Hear, Hear!) The labor movement long realized what it meant.

“When the country was unexpectedly thrust into the war, we sent our sons in hundreds of thousands. They have discharged their duty. Now they are coming back and they are asking for the right to live. Let us consider the promises made to them. ‘Your jobs are waiting for you when you come back, boys,’ they were told. (Laughter!) How many jobs are waiting for them, now they come back? (Cries of ‘none.’) Labor pointed out throughout the war that the government should get on the job and appoint committees to deal with the employment question the day that the war came to a close. What have they done? (Nothing!)

“ ‘But the government alone is not to blame,’ Mr. Fester continued. ‘The big, powerful capitalistic interests must bear part of the blame.

“ ‘There is one firm right here in Hamilton – (‘Give us the name!’ – from all over the audience.) Very well, let us call it the Tuckett company with one of its directors a powerful man in the government – (Cries of ‘General Mewburn!) – the managers of which went among its employees telling them that if they would enlist, their jobs would be waiting for them when they came back. They put up placards to the same effect on the factory walls. What have they done now? They have closed down their plant in Hamilton and moved to Montreal to get the cheap labor in Quebec. (Cries of ‘Shame!’) In Toronto, they of a similar stripe also moved to Montreal. I could cite hundreds of cases in which the manufacturers have given the returned soldiers a raw deal.

“ ‘Personally, I hope that discretion will be exercised in the deportation of these alien enemies. There are many who have settled down and married Canadian women and are living decent lives in the community. I believe that the Great War Veterans association has this in mind.

                             F.F. MACPHERSON

“Mr. MacPherson, representing the Canadian club, embarked well enough when he expressed his personal indignation at the arrogant attitude of the alien enemies who have been allowed to profit by the war. ‘They would be treated as enemies, and not allowed to go free to make big wages,’ Mr. MacPherson said. ‘Our executive certainly endorsed the principle of this resolution, but we, independently of the opinion of other bodies, would certainly like to see discretion exercised as to who should be deported. I have been out in the west, where many of the aliens are living as reputable citizens of the country, for they are all alike. Some of them have fulfilled the duties of citizenship, although they have not become assimilated. It is partly our own fault, for we have allowed them to collect in communities so that they have not come under the Canadianizing influences. We hope that something will be done in the future to make such a condition impossible in our country.’

“The murmurs of dissent which had followed the latter portion of Mr. MacPherson’s address culminated at this point in a storm of hissing and cries of ‘Kick them out!’ and the speaker, sensing that his doctrine was not acceptable, gracefully withdrew.

                             A.C. GARDEN

“ ‘The only objection that we have to make with the resolution is that it did not go far enough,’ was the statement of A.C. Garden, president of the board of trade, in introducing the first subsidiary resolution which was loudly applauded. ‘The resolution was sent to us by the G.W.V.A. and it was considered by one of the largest meetings of the council who was out fully in accord with it. It is exactly what the people of Hamilton feel and what the people of Canada feel.

“Mr. Garden proceeded to give a few figures. ‘There are in our city 4,554 enemy aliens who have to report every month to the police station here. Out of that 4,554, there are only 36 Germans and a few Turks. There are over two thousand Austrians and two thousand Bulgarians.

“Statistics show that 80 per cent of the police court cases in Hamilton were foreign cases. Hamilton has no right to take the onuses of the offences of these men. Eighty-five per cent of the convicted criminals of this city last year were aliens. There needs to be a fine combing out of these undesirables  so that they can be returned from whence they came.

“ ‘I am aware that messages have been passing between the war conference and Ottawa concerning the enemies which have been interned. Arrangements should be made as soon as possible to ship out the enemy aliens somewhere. I hope that the government will exterminate these miserable vermin from our land legally, lawfully, effectually and eternally.’ Prolonged applause followed Mr. Garden’s address.

                             A.H.PRATT

“The first subsidiary resolution was seconded by A.H. Pratt, president of the East Hamilton Great War Veterans’ association.

“ ‘We have been working for twelve solid months on this question,’ he declared in commencement. ‘We have been to Ottawa time after time, and it has been the old waste paper basket time after time. They told us the last time that it was an international question that could only be decided when the armistice was signed. Now it’s wait till the peace conference is over. I believe that with quick action the aliens could be all out of the country by the time that the conference is over.

“ ‘They claim that they have not enough ships. They had enough  ships to take 4,000 soldiers overseas – surely they can find enough transports to carry back 40,000 aliens.

“ ‘It is said, ‘don’t criticize the government too much. I do criticize the government from Sir Robert Borden down. (Applause.) We have always been sidestepped. But we don’t intend to be sidestepped again. We have so much trouble with pensions and widows’ pensions and disability allowances that we are about ready to take some action if the government won’t take any action. I believe in everybody laying their cards right on the table – soldiers, labor, employers, government, everybody.

“ ‘We had a great big meeting on the same question last year. Where did we get? Nowhere. The last time we didn’t have the board of trade gentlemen behind us; but they are now because they see we have had a rotten deal ever since we started to come back home. We have just as much brains and intelligence as the big people say they have.

“ ‘When this deputation is sent to Ottawa, it will never leave until it knows that what we demand is going to be done. We have enough of the old four-flushing about ‘serious consideration.’

“ ‘We are counselled to be calm. But I am here to tell you that this thing is spreading fast. There are 25,000 fully paid up members in Ontario, and 60,000 throughout the Dominion, and hundreds are joining every day. The government tried to put the onus on the manufacturer. I put it right back on the people at Ottawa, for they have got the power.

“ ‘There is a bone of contention between soldiers and the labor people. Why? Because certain unions have taken in alien enemies. Our comrades disagree with them. We want them to throw out the alien enemies. It is said that 90 per cent of the rank and file in the armies were composed of laboring men. Labor should keep its ranks clean.

                             GAVE WARNING

“ ‘Some of the speakers have deprecated any unconstitutional methods on the part of the returned soldiers. As a member of the provincial executive, I say that I will refuse to take responsibility much longer if the government refuses to take action regarding the aliens. If the government doesn’t do something for us, we intend to tell the citizens the truth. You boys all knew that when you left the front on leave you were pledged to tell nothing about what you knew. We kept our word. Now the government is getting a little scared because we are asking for a square deal. If we can’t get anything done in a constitutional way, we shall do it in other ways.

“ ‘We are in possession of facts concerning the manufacturing plants employing enemy aliens. We know what money they are getting in a great many cases. One or two of the firms have awakened and are up and doing  and have shown themselves as gentlemen in their dealing with the returned men. We find it isn’t always the manufacturer to blame. Many of them have lost their sons over there, although they can get the ‘flavor’ of the thing as we can. The trouble we find in the factories is with the straw bosses and foremen. (‘Hear, Hear’)

“ ‘We need to discuss this thing in the trenches, in the dugouts and in the reserve billets. The boys declared that they were going to change conditions in this country when they came back. But a great many of the boys who made that pledge will never come back. The returned soldiers have a duty to the dead, and they are going to fulfill that duty.

                             ANOTHER RESOLUTION

“The second subsidiary resolution was moved by Lieut.-Col. Charles R. McCullough without any comment. Lieut. C.W. Heming, president of the West Hamilton Great War Veterans’ association in seconding the resolution, declared that the government had been ‘too soft’ in its treatment of the aliens, and asserted that his own brother, Townley Heming, had been murdered by an enemy alien.

“The original form of this resolution provided for a representative from each of the east and west branches of the G.W.V.A., the board of trade, the Canadian club and a fifth representative appointed by the committee thus formed. A lady asked why labor was not represented, so the resoutin was amended to provide that the fifth member should represent the labor interests. In this form the motion passed with enthusiasm.

                             BITTER AGAINST OBJECTORS.

“The question as to the disposition of the conscientious objectors now serving in the various penitentiaries and other institutions was dragged into the discussion, the council of the board of trade seeking support for a strong resolution it is sending to the acting prime minister against the release of the objectors from prison.

“ ‘Thank God,’ Mayor Booker ejaculated, ‘they are in jail!’ But I have just received a letter asking me whether I was in favor of letting these men go who had refused to their part in this war. I put that letter in the fire like a flas of lightning.’

          “ ‘The infernal skunks!’ was the elegant term applied by George C. Martin, of the council of the board of trade, to the objectors. He said that the council mhad received a secular from the father of one of the objectors asking if it was in favor of granting the objectors their release, and if so, requesting that Sir Thomas White, acting prime minister, be informed forthwith.

“ “If there is a mean thing that crawls on the earth, it is the conscientious objector,’ said Mr. Martin. ‘Of course, there may be one or two of them who might be absolutely conscientious.’

“ ‘Let them get out of the country if they are unwilling to fight,’ interrupted Mayor Booker.

“ ‘But they should either be kept in jail for the rest of their lives or be heavily fined to the extent that they can pay and forever barred the franchise of Canadian citizenship. We are putting through a mighty good strong resolution asking the government to put these fellows where they belong.’

“At this point a soldier jumped up and protested against the inequality of the sentences of the conscientious objectors and defaulters. The objectors were given two and ten years while in Quebec the defaulters were being assessed 35. The soldiers had witnessed against the objectors at Niagara camp, ‘and they were a poor, miserable lot,’ he said.

“God Save the King was sung with great enthusiasm and the great gathering dispersed amidst the music of the G.W.V.A. band.”4

4 “Feeling Strong for Aliens’ Deportation : Lyric Theater Crowded to the Doors, and Overflow Meetings Necessitated : Resolutions Adopted by Standing Vote at Gathering Under G.W.V.A. Auspices”

Hamilton Spectator.   February 10, 1919.

The Spectator also carried a strong editorial endorsing what had been resolved at the mass meeting:

 “There can be no possible shadow of doubt, after the remarkable demonstration at the Lyric theater yesterday afternoon – if any existed before – as to the prevailing sentiment of Hamilton regarding the question of alien labor. The densely-packed theater, and the huge throngs unable to obtain admission, are the outward signs of a resistless current of opinion, which cannot be longer held in check by mere expressions of sympathy and specious promises. Action, not words, is demanded, and if the government is wise, it will try to sense the viewpoint of the people; for it will be a fatal policy to ignore the growing temper of impatience – ‘disgust,’ as one War Veteran put it – with the methods of officialdom. The meager outcome of a similar mass meeting held last year in the Temple theater was referred to by President Peart, of the East end branch of the Great War Veterans, and he made it unmistakably plain that the organization he represented would not submit quietly to a similar result on the present occasion. It must  ne recognized, however, that transportation is not the only difficulty the government has to contend with. A reasonable time must be given.

“Enemy aliens must go – there is not question about that and no compromise possible. And, in addition to the enemy aliens, there are ‘undesirables’ – the degenerates and criminals of whatever nationality – which also cannot be retained. Mr. Tresham, in moving a resolution to this effect, expressed himself and those he represented as being ‘actuated solely by a desire to serve the best interests of Canada.’ He had his audience with him in everything he said. He warned against German propaganda, and the presence in Hamilton of a ‘number of out-and-out Anarchists and not a few Bolshevists, Bolshevism being the child of German intrigue.’ The volleys of applause with which these remarks were greeted are indicative of the staunch loyalty of the Canadian workers. The keynote of the whole meeting was, plainly, to seek redress by constitutional means, to put the legal machinery in motion. Such a loyal attitude should be rewarded, not exploited. It cannot be denied that a commendable spirit of patience has been exhibited by the people so far in the matter of alien labor; but there is a limit, and that limit has now been reached. Promises will not do; there must be speedy and definite action.”5

5 “Must Act Promptly”

Hamilton Spectator.   February 10, 1919.






Friday, 13 September 2019

Theater Closure Protest October 1918


It was not just the churches in Hamilton that were closed by the Hamilton Board of Health, that same piece of legislation also ordered doors of Hamilton’s many theaters shut tight. The Spanish Influenza epidemic was spreading exponentially in mid-October.

In response, Hamilton Medical Health Officer, backed by members of the Hamilton Board of Health, ordered closing of places where the influenza might logically be expected to be spread indiscriminately.

While many other communities, including Toronto, did not go so far as closing movie and vaudeville theaters because of the epidemic, Hamilton’s theaters were ordered to close. Ambrose J. Small, owner of Hamilton’s Grand Opera, was also president of the Canadian Theater Managers’ Association, and in the latter capacity, he wrote the following letter of protest, calling the theater ban in Hamilton unjust and unwise:

 “Editor Herald, - In connection with the temporary embargo which has been placed on the Grand Opera house and the other theaters of the city of Hamilton, I respectfully submit that all citizens in your community should be treated alike and no distinction made as between places of amusement and any other place of business or quarter of the city where the public are wont to congregate or assemble for any purpose whatsoever, as no logic or reason can be found in endeavoring to abate the epidemic in one place if it is to be encouraged in any other. The Grand and the other principal theaters of your city are thoroughly well-ventilated and infinitely less dangerous to the general public than departmental stores, market places, office buildings, elevators and street cars that are jammed to the point of suffocation during rush hours.

“I fully appreciate the sincerity which undoubtedly moved the board of health to take the action in question, but nevertheless feel that they cannot be fully aware of the very serious consequences to the managers of the theaters and those in their employ, and to the members of the various companies booked for engagements at Hamilton in the immediate future. The business has been brought to a complete standstill, all employees are thrown out of work, and the incoming attractions are forced to lay off and lose every dollar expended on salaries to their performers, customs duties on their scenic productions and advertising material that had to be paid before they could enter Canada at all, together with the hundred and one other items of expensive incidental to the transportation and movement of theatrical companies from point to point in the province of Ontario.

“It is, unfortunately, a fact that those employed in the theatrical calling, are not, as a class, saving people, and I can assure you that in the case of theater employees in Hamilton, the loss of income due to your closing order is going to be an exceedingly serious matter in very many cases. I am informed that several have already expressed themselves to the effect that they will be forced to go to other cities in search of work, and the disruption of the local theatrical business that will certainly follow, unless the order is very soon rescinded, will mean a financial loss to both managers and employees which it will be quite possible to estimate.

“I would not press this seemingly selfish point of view if I was not thoroughly convinced that the opinion of the chief officer of the Ontario provincial board of health, Dr. J. W. S. McCullough, who expressed himself as not considering the closing of such places as theaters necessary, is founded upon sound judgment. I respectfully refer you to Dr. McCullough’s published statement in the Toronto Mail and Empire of Tuesday, October 8, in column three on page five, and I also quote you the following from an editorial in the Toronto Daily News of Saturday, Oct. 12 : ‘We do not believe that the range or severity of the influenza epidemic is sufficient to justify the closing of either the schools or other places of public resort. Those who are suffering from the disease are at home. Why compel thousands of young people to expose themselves unnecessarily to infection by remaining in close touch with the patients?’

“If thought desirable by the board of health, the management of the Grand Opera House would be altogether willing, as a matter of more abundant caution, to fumigate the theater under the direction of the board, at such intervals as they might think proper. By keeping the theaters open, well-heated places of amusement are furnished to hundreds of people who otherwise will be forced to spend their time in lodgings and other places where they will be much more liable to contract colds and influenza than they would in the comfortable surroundings of the theater. Those who attend theaters are very rarely face to face, and the danger of infection is by no means as great as in places where large numbers of people are meeting face to face. The long, continued wet weather appears to be over, and with it, we may reasonably expect better health conditions.

“In conclusion, the theatrical season is a very limited one, not more than nine months of the year at most, and the earlier portion of it (September, October and November) are the only months in which the managers of theaters are at least fairly sure of some profit and a reasonable rate of interest on their investments. After that period, the Christmas shopping season begins in earnest to the great detriment of the business in theaters, the three weeks immediately preceding the holidays being invariably the dullest of the entire year; and once the Christmas and New Year festivities are over, it is but a short space of time until the Lenten season is ushered in, and with its advent, the theater is always due another protracted period of depression.

“I sincerely trust that your board of health will see their way clear to rescind the closing order and respectfully submit that in many parts of the United States, where the type of influenza is much more aggravated than in Canada, all theaters have been allowed to remain open, with only this restriction : that the members of the audiences are warned that they must use their pocket handkerchiefs  when sneezing or coughing, under a penalty of ejection from the theater.

                                                Yours very truly,

                                                          AMBROSE J. SMALL,

                                           Canadian Theater Managers’ Association.

Tuesday, October 21, 19181



1“Letters to the Editor : Closing of Theatres”

Herald.    October 23, 1918

Friday, 30 August 2019

Jack Caffery - February 1919




“Good old Jack Caffery has crossed the tape in life’s great race, and in his passing one of the most popular athletes that ever wore a shoe has gone.”

Hamilton Spectator.   February 12, 1919.

It was a sad morning for Hamilton sports enthusiasts, especially those who followed marathon racing, when the news came out that Jack Caffery had died at his family home on Melborne street.

The Spectator carried a photo taken of Jack Caffery and quickly put out the news in that paper’s afternoon edition.

“As his death was not completely unexpected, there was an already put together account of his running career ready to appear :

“The entire world knew of the great feats of Jack Caffery, for he was, without doubt, one of the greatest long distance runners that was ever developed. Being a natural runner, he was taken in hand by Tommy Power and Lawrence Robertson, away back in 1897, and they trained him for the Herald race of the year following. He won the bay event in 1898, establishing a new record by covering the course in 1.54.05. His feat was considered phenomenal, but that was at the time when Billy Sherring was also springing into the limelight, and the result was that next year he was forced to follow Sherring down York street. The year following he turned the tables on Sherring, and made a new mark of 1.31.52, which stood until Sammy Mellor established a new record three years later, only to have Jimmy Duffy make it still lower in 1912.

“In 1900, both Sherring and Caffery went to Boston to compete in the famous Marathon there, and some of the older followers of the sport will remember the great race between the pair. For nineteen miles, Sherring was well out in front, leading Caffery at one stage by nearly a mile, but Jack did not allow that fact to excite him in any way, and he kept to his steady pace which he figured would win in the end. And he guessed right. Sherring was overcome with the heat and had to stop for treatment for so long that many runners passed him, but he came around, and managed to pass them all but Caffery, who won, and set a mark that Bostonians could not credit, clipping nearly twenty miles off the record. He covered the course that day in 2.29.44, and the Yankees thought it would stand forever, but Jack went back the next year, and although he did not have the benefit of Sherring’s fast pace, he covered the distance in 2.29.23 2-5, a record that stood until Tom Longboat went to Beantown in 1907, Caffery was the only man to win the Boston event twice.

“He went back to Boston a couple of times after but could never manage to finish in the first three, the opposition being keener and his condition not what it was in the years previous. He also competed in the Herald race a couple of times after that, but never managed to win again. For a time, it was feared he was going into decline, and he spent the biggest part of a year in the north country, where he regained his health, and when the trial races were being held to select the team to represent Canada at the Olympic games in England in 1898, he staged a great come back and made a showing that entitled him to a place on the team. In the big race, he was jogging along in sixth place, but with but seven miles to go, when he was taken ill as a result of drinking wine which had been given him, and he had been given him, and he had to drop back, but he showed his gameness by sticking to his guns, and he finished eleventh in a field that comprised the best distance men of the entire world. That was Jack’s last great race, although he loved running, and many a Sunday morning he could be found in the togs that brought him glory at Boston, jogging over the bay course.”1

1 “Jack Caffery, Famous Distance Runner, Dead ; Only Man to Win the Boston Marathon Twice – His Career”

Hamilton Spectator.   February 12, 1919.

The Spectator reporter assigned the Caffery matter did manage to quickly get ahold of Caffery’s former competitors and other associates for reaction :

“The news of Jack Caffery’s death , while not altogether a surprise, was received with deep regret in local sporting circles this morning. One of Jack’s strongest competitors in the days when he was in his prime was Billy Sherring, winner of the Olympic marathon of 1906.

“ ‘No gamer runner lived than poor old Jack Caffery,’ said Sherring this morning, ‘and I do not believe that there was ever a faster one at ten miles or over. I often thought that if Caffery had been in his prime when the indoor marathon craze was on in New York, he would have shown them all up. He had a peculiar gait such as I have never see in any other long distance man, and I think his style would have been ideal for board work. He did not lift his feet very far from the ground and took a short stride, but it always got him there at the end. At the time, the rivalry between us was greatest, I always figured that if I could defeat Jack Caffery, I could win.’

                   ___________________________________

“ ‘It is too bad that Jack Caffery was not in his prime as a runner when Longboat and other stars were so prominent,’ said Sol Mintz. “He was a wonderful runner and I do not believe his best was ever shown, for Jack made it a point to win without paying too much attention to records. In his fastest races, he was never extended, such as some of the men who broke his records later on were.’

                             _____________________________________

          “ Tommy Powers and Lawrence Robertson, the men who brought Caffery out, and who later developed other good runners, always figured that Caffery was the greatest distance runner that ever lived.

“ ‘He was a natural runner,’ said Mr. Powers, ‘and training him was one of the easiest jobs a man could have. He liked to run, and if we sent him out in the morning to a named point and back, you could always depend on his covering the ground selected. Other runners we have trained were apt to run a mile or two, sit down and rest, and then come back with a story about how well they felt. When Caffery won the first Boston , the members of the Boston A.A. thought that he was ready for a long rest, but a few minutes after the race, he was around as sprightly as ever. I believe that Jack revolutionized training for long distance running, for until he went to Boston no runner ever thought of running anything like a marathon distance in training. He was the gamest man we ever handled, and I think that he was the greatest distance man ever developed, despite the fact that his records have all been broken.’’ 2

2 “Sporting Comment”

Hamilton Spectator.   February 12, 1919.

Jack Caffery had suffered a recent attack of influenza. His passing at age 39 was peaceful.

There was a funeral procession as his body was taken from his Melbourne street home, along Locke street to St. Joseph’s hospital for the funeral. He was later buried in Holy Sepulcher cemetery.

Saturday, 15 June 2019

Domestic Relations and the Hamilton Police Court - December 14 1918


Most days in the Hamilton Police Court were routine, cases involving drunks predominating. However, there were usually situations involving human interest that provided material for the police court reporters with the Hamilton daily newspapers.

On December 14, 1918, the Hamilton Police Court, Magistrate George Jelfs, featured the appearance of Mr. Ed Leighton, charged with non-support by this wife, who had separated from him, alleging domestic violence and the interference in their lives by her mother-in-law, Mrs. Leighton.

The Herald reporter, writing quickly so that his article would be in the afternoon edition, began his lengthy account of the case as follows :      “Sixteen months of marital romance wrecked by apple of discord in the Eden of matrimony, ye olde mother-in-law, was the tale unfolded in police court this morning. Edward Leighton, 6 Smith avenue, and wife Rita, brought their linen into court. It got an airing but not a washing.”

In her testimony, Rita said that her husband had supported her up to last June, though they had quarreled right along. Then, he ordered her to get out of their home after his mother had accused her of going around with other men. Rta declared that Ed had awakened her up by his efforts to remove her rings from her fingers on the morning before she left the house.

Rita claimed that the first payment of $50 made on their Smith avenue house was given to Ed by her father, and that the second and last payment of $300 had been given to her by her father.

In his statement to the magistrate, Ed Leighton declared that Rita left of her own free will.  He also said had, however, been out with other men, and attended dances without him.

Rita immediately protested :“ ‘If God should strike me down dead, that is not true, He knew where I went every time I went out. Mr. Jelfs, his mother used to come to our house at 11 o’clock at night and cause trouble.’

The husband’s defense lawyer forcefully questioned Rita, trying to portray Ed as a good husband, while at the same portraying her as not being a good wife:

“In answer to Ed.’s counsel, W.M. McClemont, Mrs. Leighton emphatically and vigorously denied being in the company of other men, but she admitted to him that she and her friend, Miss Hays, had given a dance in a public hall in West Hamilton last Wednesday.

“ ‘Have you anything to say against the character of this young men? Isn’t he a respectable young man?’ demanded Mr. McClemont.

“ ‘No,’ murmured Deputy Chief Coulter, who lives on the same street as Ed.

“ ‘You’d better keep out of this. If you have anything to say against this young man, you’d better say it on the stand,’ heatedly observed the lawyer.

“ After we got married, he kept on going around with the girl he went with before he met me,’ stated Mrs. Leighton.

“ ‘Oh, ho, there’s your model young husband for you. Running around with other women,’ observed Crown Attorney Washington to Mr. McClemont.

“ ‘He punched me and struck me in the face and hit me with a towel,’ claimed Rita, but that matter did not seem to impress Magistrate Jelfs:

“ ‘I don’t like to encourage young married women to live apart from their husbands and get support from them. I can’t see that there was desertion in this case,’ declared his worship.

“ ‘The case as it stands at present is that the woman was struck at least twice and turned out of the house,’ pointed out Crown Attorney Washington.

“ ‘Well, I hold that she wasn’t put out,’ ruled the magistrate.

“ ‘Well, of course, if you hold that, there’s nothing further to be said; but it’s there in the evidence, ‘ replied the crown.

At this point, the magistrate attempted to reach some sort of reconciliation between Ed and Rita:

“Turning to the wife, his worship inquired: ‘Are you willing to go back and live with your husband?’

“ ‘Yes,’ replied Rita, ‘if his mother will keep away and not interfere with us. She used to come before as late as half past eleven o’clock and make trouble between us. I begged her to keep away, but she wouldn’t. I tried my best to do what’s right.’

“ Addressing the husband, his worship then asked : ‘Are you willing to take your wife back to live with you?’ Edward, who stood with folded arms and an air of injured innocence throughout the case, answered in a thin, complaining voice: ‘She runs around with too many men.’

“ ‘Well, it didn’t  look right for her to hold that dance,’ commented his worship.

“ ‘There’s nothing to show it wasn’t a respectable dance,’ objected the crown.

‘ ‘There’s no such thing as a respectable dance outside of a real ball, and even then I wouldn’t encourage my daughter to go to one,’ replied his worship.

“The case was dismissed  and a legal separation advised.”1

The police magistrate was the targeted for some pointed barbs because of his handling of the case such as in the following

“Letter to the Editor : Jelfs On Dances”

Hamilton Herald.    December 16, 1918.

“Editor Herald – In your Saturday’s edition, I see Magistrate Jelfs is handing out some of his ‘wise’ sayings again, namely : ‘There is no such thing as a respectable dance outside of a real ball.’ To say the least, he is not very complimentary to the lady chaperones of one large dance hall in this city, nor is he consistent in the first place, is he not a member of the license board? Then why, if he knows so much, does he issue licenses to so many dance halls in the city? Fie, you young people of Hamilton! You who go to dances are not respectable. Jelfs has said so, and has he not the wisdom of Solomon? I wonder how much longer this city is going to be ruled by cranks? First we have Norman Clark with his fool ban, and then ‘wise’ Mr. Jelfs with his foolish sayings. Both of them are big enough for a job in Port Credit or Bronte, but not big enough for their jobs in a city like Hamilton. Lucky for them both they are not elected by the ratepayers.
(To Be Continued)

Saturday, 18 May 2019

Returned Soldiers Arrival - December 1918




“The Soldiers’ Aid commission is without word as to the time of the arrival of the veterans who disembarked from the Olympic last Saturday.”

Hamilton Spectator.     December 17, 1918.

Three days after the RMS Olympic docked at Halifax with a full load of soldiers returning from Western Europe, Hamiltonians whose loved ones were supposed to be on that ship, and Hamiltonians hoping to give them a warm welcome, had little idea when that arrival would happen:

“Word comes from Toronto, however, that the local party may not arrive until Thursday. Mr. Kaye yesterday afternoon sent a telegraph to Lieut-Col. John Gunn, D.O.C., asking for assistance in making arrangements for his homecoming of the Hamilton boys. So Far, however, he has received no reply.”1

1 “On Their Way : But Returned Men May Not Arrive Before Thursday ”

Hamilton Spectator.    December 17, 1918.

Mr. Kaye of the Hamilton office of the Soldiers’ Aid Commission repeatedly tried to get an exact idea as to when, or even which railway line, the returning soldiers would finally arrive in Hamilton. Not receiving a definitive answer, he nevertheless put into motion the steps he could take in the meantime. A major task was to assemble enough automobiles and their drivers to meet the men after they disembarked from the train so that they could be driven to their homes.

Finally, on December 18, 1918, Mr. Kaye received a telegraph that the Hamilton soldiers had reached Toronto by rail. They would soon be transferred to a train heading for Hamilton but no expected time of arrival was given. Nor was anyone told  whether the boys would get off a Grand Trunk railway at that railway’s station on Stuart Street or, whether they would come on a C.P.R. train to be let off at that line’s station uptown on Hunter street west.

A Spectator reporter had been assigned to cover the arrival, but he was in the dark as to where and when the men would arrive. Nevertheless, that reporter like everyone else rushed from one station to the other. His report on the whole matter was a vivid, superbly-written article, an article  which follows :

“ ‘Good old Hamilton!’ they roared as the big C.P.R. train crashed into the depot  the grinding of the brakes as they bit into the wheels, and mingled with the thunderous cheers of the multitude and - the excited shrieks of girls and little children.

“Then they emerged – these boys of ours – and little drops of khaki were lost in a sea of excited humanity. Now and then would be heard – ‘Here’s Bill!’ – ‘My Joe!’ as the dense crowd surged to and fro from coach to coach and anxious eyes peered through the gloom of the dimly-lit station to catch a glimpse of some loved one.

“Finally the first warriors managed to break through the massed formation and began to straggle down the platform, with eager kiddies clustered round and willing hands bearing the bulky kit-bags to the rear of the depot, where a veritable battalion of automobiles awaited the veterans.

“Bronzed and hale were these men of Flanders and the terrible cloud that had hung over humanity and which they labored and fought and bled to remove appeared to have touched them but lightly. Some of them added a finishing touch to the realism of the scene by carrying their rusty trench-helmets with the packs on their backs.

“Old Bill was there, and Alf and Bert – all of them enjoying the excitement and the glamor. Old Bill’s missus had been jubilating and fretting alternately since the telegraph boy brought her the message last Friday that hubby had reached Halifax. She had learned first that Bill was coming on Tuesday, and then on Wednesday, and finally on Thursday. She was in a state of excitement as she dressed up the kiddies yesterday afternoon yesterday and hustled them down to the G.T.R. depot to meet the train on which the boys were ‘sure’ to arrive; and when the news spread through the Stuart street station, that the boys weren’t coming she joined the weary pilgrimage of the hundreds of soldiers’ folk, tired and supperless up to the Hunter street depot, while five-year-old Jimmie ‘wished the kayser would get the flu and die,’ as he tottled alongside. But all was forgotten as she clasped Old Bill’s strong arm, and followed him as he threaded his way through the crowds. To the reporters Bill stated that he ‘didn’t want nuffin’ in the papers,’ but he accepted the hospitality of the automobile which was waiting to transport him and his to ‘the better ‘ole’ down in East Hamilton.

“Fifty-three veterans arrived – soldiers of all ranks and grade, from the grey-haired South African vet to the smooth-faced lad who was met with an army of small brothers and sisters. There was no lack of accommodation, thanks to the Kiwanis club, while the civic reception committee, the Salvation Army, and the soldiers’ aid commission did the honors for the returned boys on behalf of the city.”2

2 “Crowds Greeted Returned Heroes on Their Arrival : Fifty-Three Hamilton Men Back From the Front : Many of Them Saw Four Years’ Fighting : Kiwanis Club and Others Tendered Reception ”

Hamilton Spectator.   December 18 1918.




Tuesday, 7 May 2019

Hamilton Editors Want End of Restrictions - December 1918

December 6, 1918, exactly one week after the Hamilton Board of Health once again imposed restrictions on public gatherings, the patience and spirit of co-operation which had been shown by citizens were starting to fray.

On that day, the city newspapers reported on two segments of the community organizing to have the restrictions cancelled or at least modified substantially. The retail community which was suffering financial hardship was one of the communities, while the other involved clergymen of various faiths hoping to be able to re-open their churches for public worship.

Hamilton Board of Health chairman Norman Clark was invited to attend a meeting convened by members of the retail community:

 “The merchants will back up the board of health to the best of their ability, believing that it has acted with the best possible judgement with regard to the restrictions placed upon the city since the recrudescence of the epidemic. This was the unanimous resolution of a meeting of the merchants at the board of trade rooms this morning, which Norman Clark, chairman of the board of health, was invited to attend and to discuss the matter of early closing of the stores and other restrictions.

                             TALKED IT OVER

“Lieut.-Col. R.A. Robertson was in the chair, and Robert McLaren acted as secretary, and the large and many of the smaller stores were represented. Prior to the arrival of Mr. Clark, a discussion took place between the merchants, and a program asking for certain modifications drawn up. This was read by Col. Robertson when Mr. Clark appeared.

                             REMOVE BAN SATURDAY

“The merchants, he said, were not criticizing the action of the board of health, and in calling this meeting and inviting Mr. Clark, they were not actuated by any spirit of animosity, but merely with the desire to show certain sides of the situation which might not have presented themselves to the board of health. Closing at 4 o’clock was the cause of great loss to the merchants; nevertheless they were willing to sacrifice themselves for the public interest. However, with regard to the idea which actuated this regulation – that the store clerks should not be forced to mingle with the crowds of factory hands going home at a later hour – it was thought that the board of health had not given the matter the consideration it deserved. Especially with regard to Saturday, it was felt there would be no mingling of the shoppers with the factory workers in the street cars since the factories closed down at 12, and the Saturday afternoon shopping did not commence until a later hour.

“As to the congestion in the stores, it was thought by the merchants that if the shopping hours were extended over a longer time, the congestion would be greatly eased, both in the stores themselves, and on the street cars.

                             NO DANGER

“ ‘We feel,’ said Col. Robertson, ‘while we are anxious for the safety of the public, we must also have a regard for their convenience. For this reason, we think that Saturday should be open all day, which would not only be a convenience to the general shoppers, but especially to clerks in offices who are practically unable to shop during the week.’

                   AN INJUSTICE

“Another point put forward was the injustice of allowing small stores to remain open after 4 o’clock. This only resulted in a greater congestion in these stores, which was more harmful than if the public were distributed all over the stores.

                             DRUG STORES TOO

“That drug stores should be under the same regulation was also thought to be a ridiculous ruling, since their trade was required more than ever during the epidemic.

“ ‘One more kick,” concluded Col. Robertson, ‘is that retail stores are the sole sufferers under the regulations, and the factories escape. Why should people be denied the rights of shopping because of factory employees?’

                             IN INTERESTS OF HEALTH

“In replying, Mr. Clark stated that he could not possibly answer all these questions.

“ ‘I have answered questions till I am black in the face,’ he said, ‘I have done absolutely no business, and while the storekeepers talk of what they’re losing, I will say that I don’t any business has suffered as much as mine has.’

“The whole situation, he said, had been considered by the board of health, and it had a reason for everything that was put into proclamation.

“ ‘If it were for me to decide,  I would say that the board of health has done exactly what was right. Gentlemen, I don’t think you are right,’ said Mr. Clark earnestly. ‘You are taking the same attitude as the churches have done. The clergymen should be very careful what they say. They have called us materialistic, but it seems to me that there is something very materialistic in their arguments. We are up against a wall – you on the on hand, the people on the other. I think that the citizens should take it in the best spirit and endeavor to work it out as they can. Deputations are no good, gentlemen. We want to have a representative from the board of trade at our meeting this afternoon with the medical men, but we feel that the merchants should endeavor to back us up. If the people of Hamilton themselves show us that they won’t have these restrictions, then we will take the ban off. We haven’t been doing this thing for ourselves.’

“With regard to the Saturday proposition, Mr. Clark said that in his opinion, this was something which might be considered by the board of health.

Colonel Robertson said he thought this might be solve the problem of overcrowding directly after the ban had been removed.

                             WITH THE BOARD

“At this juncture, T.H. Pratt said: ‘Gentlemen, I am obliged to leave this meeting now, but I want to say before I go that I think it would be a great mistake to keep the stores open until 10 o’clock at night. I would strongly protest against it. Let us back up the board of health.’ Said Mr. Pratt, as he left the room, to Mr. Clark; ‘if you can satisfy every business man in this city, you are a genius, and go to it.’

                             WILL BACK BOARD’

“F.R. Smith, of Oak Hall, having heard the argument  of Mr. Clark, he was convinced that the board of health was doing every thing in its judgment to combat the epidemic and he thought that the stores of the city should back it up. This was the feeling in general of the meeting and Mr. Clark withdrew after thanking all present very heartily for this action.

“ ‘At the first opportunity, we will take the ban off,’ were his parting words. As he withdrew a hearty clapping was accorded him.”1

1 “Lift the Ban on Saturdays Ask Merchants : Board of Health Will Consider Request Today : The Merchants Assured Chairman They Were With Board.”

Hamilton Herald.    December 06, 1918.

Equally desiring the lifting of restrictions of public gatherings were clergymen who took their concerns directly to the board of health:

 “Clergymen representing four Protestant denominations – Anglican, Baptist, Methodist and Presbyterian – have forwarded a letter to Dr. Roberts, M.O.H., in which they ask for a modification of the closing order as it applies to churches. They point out that the street railway company, merchants and manufacturers are permitted to operate under regulation and think the same privilege should be extended to them.

                             WILL CONSIDER IT TODAY

“When asked what action would be taken regarding the letter, Dr. Roberts, medical health officer, stated that it would be laid before the board of health at a meeting which will be held this afternoon. When asked if, in his opinion, the request would be granted, Dr. Roberts declared to offer an opinion, stating that the whole matter would be given careful consideration by the board.

“The letter follows :

“To the Medical Officer of Health:

Dear Sir – Arising out of a conversation with you this morning, we submit the following statement of our views as to terms upon which we feel that the ban on churches might be lifted and the rights of public worship restored .It is hardly necessary to say that no body of public servants is more fully alive to the gravity of the present epidemic than the clergy, who are in frequent attendance upon the sick, both in hospitals and private homes. It is no spirit of ignorance or indifference to the public welfare that we ask for a modification of the regulations regarding churches, but in the conscientious conviction that, through the maintenance of public worship, we render our highest service both to God and men.

“We do not base our claim for open churches upon the democratic principles of freedom of conscience and equal justice for all. The regulations, as they stand, seem to us to discriminate unfairly against churches for two reasons:

“1. The street cars are permitted to carry five passengers over their full seating capacity. If this be consonant with the safeguarding of the public health, it cannot be reasonably maintained that a congregation, however small, in a church, however large, is a menace.

“2. The board of health has extended to factories the principle of self-regulation, the right to make their own arrangements for the good both of the public and their employees.

“Our request is that the churches shall be treated on the same principle. While we believe it be the general consensus of the medical opinion that the churches might safely be omitted from the closing order, we are prepared, if this cannot be conceded, to limit our congregations to half their normal size. Of course, every clergyman must make his own arrangements to provide for this. Some of us would arrange that a certain portion of the members of the congregation should attend only in the morning, and others, only in the evening. Other clergymen will prefer to double the number of services and halve the congregations.

“We believe that such permission will go far towards allying the widespread discontent that is only too apparent; that it would be in the interests of both public health and civic peace.

“The earliest possible consideration of our proposal will be much appreciated.

                   (Signed)    S. Daw

                                      W.B. Tighe,

                                      C.L. McIrvine.

                                      W.H. Sedgewick

          “Note the clergymen, whose signatures are attached, are representatives of the Anglican, Baptist, Methodist and Presbyterian bodies. As it has not been possible to consult all their brethren, they do not claim to speak for anyone but themselves. Yet they have reason to believe that the arrangement proposed would be acceptable to all.

                                      “W.P.Robertson

                                                (Acting as secretary.)

“18 South West Avenue.

                             Will ENFORCE LAW

“According to present indications, there is every possibility of a clash between officials of the health department and some of the clergy next. Rev. Joseph Englert, rector of St. Ann’s Roman Catholic church, informed a Herald reporter this morning that he would hold public service Sunday next.

“ ‘So far as I know at present time, service will be held in my church Sunday next,’ said Father Englebert.

“Dr. Roberts stated positively yesterday that he would take all necessary steps to see that the order prohibiting the holding of public meetings was strictly observed, and when asked if violations of health laws would be summoned to court, stated that the law gave him the right to call on police to see that his orders are carried out, and that he was not out to collect fines, but to see that the law was enforced.” 1

1 “City Clergymen Ask for Modified Order : They Think That Board of Health Should Permit Them to Hold Services, As It Allows Street Cars to Operate and Stores and Factories to Remain Open : To Deal With Matter Today : Dr. Roberts Stated That Their Request Would Be Carefully Considered, and Decision May Be Reached This Afternoon”

Hamilton Herald.    December 06, 1918.

The editor of the Hamilton Herald, on December 6, 1918, gave support to both the retail and faith communities in their efforts to ease restrictions placed by the board of health :

 “When the board of health issued its new closing order a week ago, the Herald counseled citizens generally to draw upon their stock of patience, bow to the board’s authority and observe the regulations loyally. We still hold it to be the duty of citizens to observe the regulations. But we would most respectfully urge upon the board of health, and the committee of doctors which is acting in association with the board, to consider whether the time has not come when the regulations can be relaxed in some degree and changes made which would mitigate many cases of hardship. Consideration might also be given to the possibility that in some details the regulations actually operate to defeat the purpose in view.

“The order permitting business places to be open after 4 p.m. with only the proprietor present to serve customers appears to be a case in point. One of the object aimed at in the regulations is the prevention of crowding; but the regulation  we allude to results frequently in crowding for, as it is impossible for one man to serve promptly all the customers that enter his store, many have to wait and there is congestion. With two or more salesmen, there would be comparatively few customers in the place at one time.

“And surely there would be little or no danger in permitting certain religious services in churches if the attendance were strictly limited. There are many persons to whom frequent and regular communion is a religious duty of the highest importance, and a most precious religious privilege. To cut them off unnecessarily from this means of spiritual grace is an unfair exercise of authority. The question is whether the order forbidding all religious services is necessary to the public health. We do not believe it is. The prohibition of general congregational meetings may be necessary, but surely not special communion services with only a few persons present.

“It is to be hoped that the health authorities will be able to see their way clear to reviewing the regulations and making changes to those which cause unnecessary hardship. And we hope also that the regulations as a whole will be relaxed as the epidemic wanes. They should not be kept in force a day longer than necessary.”1

1 “Relax the Regulations”

Hamilton Herald.    December 06, 1918.