Thursday 4 April 2013

1913 - Two Letters to the Editor



When annoyed about matters in Hamilton in the spring of 1913, two Hamiltonians vented their frustrations in a way that would be received widely.
          Namely, two letters to the editor of the Hamilton Spectator appeared on Saturday, May 31, 1913.
 One was send by Thomas J. Dusablon of Wellington street, and the other writer wished to remain anonymous and so appeared in the paper as coming from RATEPAYER.
Disablon’s concern was the state of the Hamilton police service and his letter, in full follows:
“To the Editor:
I am very much amused by the frequent letters to The Spectator re the blunders of the police force of Hamilton. They remind me of an incident which occurred to my friend and myself a week or so ago. We were looking in a store window with the intention of purchasing a few post cards, when a constable approached, and rapping us on the shoulder, told us to ‘move on.’ We hesitated for a few moments as we knew we were not in the wrong, but the P.c. informed us that people were not allowed to ‘hang about’ on the sidewalks, and if we did not go we should be taken into custody. As a large number of people had collected, we thought it advisable to walk away.
“After the noble one had departed, we returned to the store and made the purchase. We informed the storekeeper of what happened and asked his opinion, as we were thinking of taking the matter up. He told us that the police had no right whatever to interfere with anyone who was looking at the window display of the store, but he advised us to let the matter drop, as the police force here are a lot of greenhorns who do not know their duties and we should get no satisfaction from headquarters. Until recent years, I travelled a great deal to other countries, but I can say that I have never seen a force so ridiculous as the police force of Hamilton, which seems to be filled up of green horns from other countries who have lived on farms all their lives previous to their coming to a city.”
RATEPAYER’S issue, which led him to write to the Spectator, concerned the effects of sporting events held at Hamilton’s Cricket grounds on the surrounding neighbourhood :
Here is RATEPAYER’S letter in full:
“To the Editor :
 Every time a ball game is held at the cricket grounds, the lawns and shrubs in that vicinity suffer, the crowds rush from and to the grounds and never look or think where they are walking or what destruction they cause. The principal corner that suffers is Herkimer and Kent streets. I think in justice to the residents in that section a police officer should be stationed around there from 4 to 6:20 p.m. If the above suggestion is acted upon by the authorities, it may be the means of making a brighter and better Hamilton.
“Another matter which I think the authorities’ attention should be brought to is the presence of a number of automobiles which are left standing outside of the ball grounds and the children in coming from school (there are three or four schools in that vicinity) seem to take a delight in tooting the horns of the autos; they even go so far as to climb in the machines and turn the wheels, and this carrying on may result in a serious accident some day. If the officer was there, it would tend to prevent this mischief.
“Hoping these suggestions will meet with the approval of the proper authorities, and thanking you for this space in your paper.
Yours very truly,
          RATEPAYER